· 11/3/1989
Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.
Citations
- 106 B.R. 367
- 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13215
- 1989 WL 134294
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting for cause requirement signals as “presumption that Congress intended to have bankruptcy proceeding adjudicated in bankruptcy court unless rebutted by contravening policy.” (internal citations omitted)
- “[Wjhether this proceeding is core or non-core is a determination which may appropriately be made, in the first instance, by the bankruptcy court, not the district court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.