Skip to main content
· 11/3/1989

Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.

Citations

  • 106 B.R. 367
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13215
  • 1989 WL 134294

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting for cause requirement signals as “presumption that Congress intended to have bankruptcy proceeding adjudicated in bankruptcy court unless rebutted by contravening policy.” (internal citations omitted)
  • “[Wjhether this proceeding is core or non-core is a determination which may appropriately be made, in the first instance, by the bankruptcy court, not the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.