Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 12/31/1952
Hatton v. State
Citations
- 252 P.2d 170
- 96 Okla. Crim. 227
- 1952 OK CR 170
- 1952 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 254
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the gist of the sufficiency of an indictment or information is whether it alleges every element of the offense intended to be charged and sufficiently apprises the defendant of what he must be prepared to meet
- the gist of the sufficiency of an indictment or information is whether it alleges every element of the offense intended to be charged and sufficiently apprises the defendant of what he must be prepared to meet
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brett, Jones, Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1995-12-12· cited 173×
- Martley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1974-02-25· cited 14×
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1977-08-05· cited 5×
- Tooisgah v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1953-03-11· cited 1×
- Lipp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1955-02-02
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.