Skip to main content
· 3/13/1992

Hatton v. Markham

Citations

  • 27 Va. Cir. 205
  • 1992 Va. Cir. LEXIS 176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that plaintiff “did not submit a timely Level 1 grievance” where his Inmate Request form was filed “thirty-one days after he allegedly sustained an injury[]” and he never filed an Inmate Administrative Remedy Form
  • affirming district court’s dismissal based on inmate’s failure to exhaust his claim against correction officer for deliberate indifference to medical needs under Administrative Directive 9.6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.