Hatton v. Grigar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because sufficient evidence existed to uphold trial court’s finding that the road was public, appellate court “need not reach” the issues regarding whether the trial court’s easement findings were proper
• not reaching sufficiency of evidence to support finding of easement by prescription when legally and factually sufficient evidence existed of implied public dedication of land, which supported trial court’s judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).