Skip to main content
· 6/8/2016

Hatmaker v. United States

Citations

  • 127 Fed. Cl. 217
  • 2016 U.S. Claims LEXIS 780
  • 2016 WL 3200081

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • setting forth the appropriate factors to consider in determining whether hearsay is reliable
  • “Due process requires that a judge issue a written statement regarding the evidence relied upon and the reasons for revoking probation”
  • defendant's statement that another individual rented vehicle did not contribute to reasonable suspicion of criminal activity
  • \[W]e recognize the risk that an alleged -1- sexual assault victim might suffer trauma from having to testify at a probation violation hearing.\
  • no basis to continue motor vehicle stop, despite absence of driver's name on rental agreement, where driver produced valid driver's license and informed officer that renter provided permission
  • setting forth criteria for assessing reliability of hearsay evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patricia E. Campbell-Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.