Texas Supreme Court· 4/23/1986
Hathaway v. General Mills, Inc.
Citations
- 711 S.W.2d 227
- 69 A.L.R. 4th 1139
- 29 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 333
- 1986 Tex. LEXIS 965
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that contradicting written and oral communications did not constitute conclusive proof of unequivocal notice
- deciding that when an “employer notifies an employee of changes to its employment terms, the employee must accept the new terms or quit”
- holding that contradicting written and oral communications did not constitute conclusive proof of unequivocal notice
- holding that contradicting written and Peterbilt's motion to compel arbitration. We conditionally oral communications did not constitute conclusive proof of grant mandamus relief. unequivocal notice
- holding that notice is provided if the employee has knowledge of the employment terms
- holding that unequivocal notice was question of fact when employee received written notice of policy modification but was told by superior “not to worry” about it and he would “take care of it”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spears
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
162 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court· 2003-12-31· cited 1,500×
- Alex Sheshunoff Management Services, L.P. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court· 2006-10-20· cited 476×
- In Re Halliburton Co.Texas Supreme Court· 2002-05-30· cited 455×
- David J. Sacks, P.C. v. HadenTexas Supreme Court· 2008-09-26· cited 295×
- Ted Kubala, Jr. v. Supreme Production Svc, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2016-07-20· cited 269×
- Walden v. Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-01-16· cited 151×
- Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 138×
- Price Pfister, Inc. v. Moore & Kimmey, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-06-07· cited 106×
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Marketing on Hold Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 2010-02-19· cited 94×
- In Re JebbiaTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-09-14· cited 94×
- Excess Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Frank's Casing Crew & Rental Tools, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 2008-02-01· cited 90×
- Kelvin S. Moulton v. City of BeaumontFifth Circuit· 1993-05-20· cited 85×
- In Re Frank Kent Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court· 2012-03-09· cited 82×
- Lamarilyn Fadeyi v. Planned Parenthood Association of Lubbock, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1998-12-07· cited 81×
- In Re Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 2006-03-03· cited 76×
- Barrand, Inc. v. Whataburger, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-12-29· cited 75×
- In Re Dallas Peterbilt, Ltd., L.L.P.Texas Supreme Court· 2006-06-16· cited 75×
- Benoit v. Polysar Gulf Coast, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-03-12· cited 63×
- Tenet Healthcare Ltd. v. CooperTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1998-01-15· cited 63×
- Ledig v. Duke Energy Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-03-23· cited 55×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-04-29· cited 418×
- Stowers v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1964-02-13· cited 54×
- Mandril v. KasishkeCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1981-07-31· cited 50×
- Gishen v. Dura Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1972-06-20· cited 29×
- People Ex Rel. Sterba v. BlaserAppellate Court of Illinois· 1975-10-06· cited 18×
- Coastal Plains Development Corp. v. Tech-Con Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1975-11-06· cited 13×
- General Mills, Inc. v. HathawayCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1985-03-28· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.