Hathaway v. General Mills, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that contradicting written and oral communications did not constitute conclusive proof of unequivocal notice
• deciding that when an “employer notifies an employee of changes to its employment terms, the employee must accept the new terms or quit”
• holding that contradicting written and oral communications did not constitute conclusive proof of unequivocal notice
• holding that contradicting written and Peterbilt's motion to compel arbitration. We conditionally oral communications did not constitute conclusive proof of grant mandamus relief. unequivocal notice
• holding that notice is provided if the employee has knowledge of the employment terms
• holding that unequivocal notice was question of fact when employee received written notice of policy modification but was told by superior “not to worry” about it and he would “take care of it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).