· 3/27/2020
Hatfield v. Heggie
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 1156
Syllabus
A written claim for reimbursement of funeral expenses is presented in accordance with R.C. 2117.06 where it was delivered to the attorney for the estate, was reviewed by the executrix, and was denied by the executrix on its merits.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- delivery of original process to defendant's father at address where defendant no longer resided did not constitute valid service
- plaintiff's general observation that constitutional due process was satisfied by method of service \ignores specific statutory requirements for effecting service on an individual defendant in Washington\
- “actual notice does not constitute sufficient service” (citing Thayer v. Edmonds, 8 Wn. App. 36, 40, 503 P.2d 1110 (1972))
- delivery of original process to defendant’s father at address where defendant no longer resided did not constitute valid service
- plaintiff’s general observation that constitutional due process was satisfied by method of service “ignores specific statutory requirements for effecting service on an individual defendant in Washington”
- \actual notice does not constitute sufficient service\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pietrykowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.