Hatfield v. Cornell
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 798
- 106 N.E.3d 794
Syllabus
The juvenile court's decision to order appellant to submit to hair follicle drug testing was proper where the record indicates there was a reasonable suspicion that appellant may have been using drugs, thereby necessitating appellant to undergo drug testing to ensure the best interest of their daughter was being met. In addition, the juvenile court's decision to terminate a shared parenting plan and grant appellee custody of their daughter was in their daughter's best interest given appellant's admitted prior drug use and presence at a house where law enforcement had recently executed a search warrant and arrested several people for possession of drugs.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- payment made by the U.S. Government to the taxpayer in a qui tam action is a reward and, as such, is includable in gross income
- “The payment to a relator in a qui tam action is not a penalty imposed on the wrongdoer; instead, it is a financial incentive for a private person to provide information and prosecute claims relating to fraudulent activity.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: S. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.