Hatcher v. Precoat Metals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a preliminary injunction was enforceable against the non-party manager of one of defendants’ businesses
• discussing various formulations of the standard in published and unpublished post-Salinger dispositions
• “Some courts have considered the strength of a movant’s case in analyzing the likelihood of harm to a potentially wrongfully enjoined nonmovant.” (collecting cases)
• “Some courts have considered the strength of a movant’s case in analyzing the likelihood of harm to a potentially wrongfully enjoined nonmovant.” (collecting cases)
• “Some courts have considered the strength of a movant's case in analyzing the likelihood of harm to a potentially wrongfully enjoined nonmovant.”
• “[T]he Winter standard . . . requires the balance of equities to tip in the movant’s favor, though not necessarily ‘decidedly’ so, even where the movant is found likely to succeed on the merits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).