Hatcher v. Howes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statement that modification of plaintiff's loan was \under consideration\ was too indefinite to establish promissory estoppel claim
• “[T]he facts do not demonstrate that . . . Defendant made a promise to consider a loan modification while knowing it would never do so.”
• “Promissory estoppel claims premised on promises to negotiate fail as a matter of law because they are not sufficiently definite[.]”
• promise that loan modification was “under consideration” would not trigger promissory estoppel doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).