Hatch v. Reliance Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint 8 was appropriate as it exceeded seventy pages in length, was confusing, conclusory, and not 9 in compliance with Rule 8
• applying the two-year statute of limitations under § 12-542 to a claim for abuse of process
• upholding a Rule 8(a) dismissal of a complaint that “exceeded 70 pages in length [and 27 was] confusing and conclusory”
• affirming a Rule 8(a) dismissal of a 24 complaint that “exceeded 70 pages in length, [and was] confusing and conclusory”
• upholding district court's determination that a conclusory complaint did not comply with Rule 8
• noting the 10 district court did not abuse discretion in dismissing complaint that included over 70 pages of 11 exhibits relying on Fed. R. Civ. P. 8

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).