Hatch v. Maine Tank Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Marois instruction was not required when the deliberate misuse of a product produced a danger that was obvious, known, and continuous over the course of several months
• no abuse of discretion in dismissing complaint for failure to comply with order compelling discovery
• “no duty to warn of a product danger that is obvious and apparent to an ordinary reasonable person”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).