Hasvold v. First USA Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that a § 1681s-2(b) private cause of action is available only where the furnisher received notice of the dispute from a consumer reporting agency, as opposed to the consumer
• dismissing state claims because “federal law under the FCRA preempts plaintiffs claims against the defendant relating to it as a furnisher of information”
• dismissing state claims because “federal law under the FCRA preempts plaintiffs claims against the defendant relating to it as a furnisher of information”
• dismissing state claims because “federal law under the FCRA preempts plaintiffs claims against the defendant relating to it as a furnisher of information”
• finding FCRA preempts state common law claims for defamation, invasion of privacy, and interference with prospective advantage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).