Hastings v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that vacatur would not “be disruptive of the agency’s regulatory program” when the challenged rule had not yet gone into effect
• ruling that fixed indexed annuities did not constitute “annuity contract” and thus was not within the exemption to the Securities Act for annuity contracts subject to state insurance laws
• holding that variable annuities were covered securities under the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).