Hastings Industrial Co. v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) and Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) and determining that those holdings “should not apply in the context” of affirmative defenses
• the Nebraska Supreme Court has “adopted the Restatement (Third) view of unjust enrichment,” which provides that a defendant can be “liable both on a theory of tort and (alternatively) on a theory of unjust enrichment”
• denying motion to strike pursuant to Rule 12(f)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).