Hasshagen v. Hasshagen
Citations
- 80 Cal. 514
- 22 P. 294
- 1889 Cal. LEXIS 948
Syllabus
<p>Trust — Conveyance to Defraud - Creditors—Verbal Agreement to Reconvey—Statute of Frauds. —When a conveyance reciting a consideration is made by a debtor-to another for the purpose of hindering and defrauding his creditors,, there is the strongest reason for a strict application of the statute of frauds, and a verbal agreement to reconvey the property will not create an express or resulting trust.</p> <p>Id.—Written Declaration of Trust—Undelivered Reconveyance — Destruction by Consent: — An- undelivered deed of reconveyance of property conveyed to hinder and defraud creditors is not effective for any purpose; and if its contents are. not proved, and the uncontradicted testimony of the grantee of the original conveyance shows that he finally paid for the property, and the undelivered deed of reconveyance was destroyed by consent of the parties upon a full settlement between them, such deed of reconveyance cannot he-held.to constitute a written declaration of trust.</p> <p>Id, — Written Evidence of Grantee. — The evidence of the grantee taken down in writing long after the conveyance, and in settlement of the estate of the grantor, admitting a verbal, agreement to reconvey upon condition of payment, of indebtedness, does not constitute a written declaration of trust.</p> <p>Id. — Written Statement of Account. —A. written statement of account given by the grantee to the widow of the grantor, showing the amounts received by the grantee as rent, and expenditures out of rent, and some payments to the grantor, does not constitute ar written declaration of a trust.</p> <p>Id. — Enforcement of Trust — Nonsuit—Finding against Evidence.—• When in an action to enforce a trust there is an entire absence of any evidence to show an express or resulting trust, and only evidence of circumstances tending to show a verbal agreement to hold the property in trust, a nonsuit should be granted, and although the evidence of the defendant to explain those circumstances is not satisfacto
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a “one-year statute of limitations on initiation of claims for theft coverage in [the plaintiffs] insurance policy is enforceable”
- insurance policy’s one-year limitation period was enforceable to bar plaintiff’s claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Works
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.