· 3/7/1996
Hassen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Citations
- 674 So. 2d 106
- 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 102
- 1996 Fla. LEXIS 333
- 1996 WL 97455
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- confirming that Florida courts “will not divine an intent that a new law be applied to disturb existing contractual rights or duties when there is no express indication that such is the legislature's intent.”
- \[I]t is generally accepted that the statute in effect at the time an insurance contract is executed governs substantive issues arising in connection with that contract.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kogan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.