Skip to main content
· 3/7/1996

Hassen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 674 So. 2d 106
  • 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 102
  • 1996 Fla. LEXIS 333
  • 1996 WL 97455

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • confirming that Florida courts “will not divine an intent that a new law be applied to disturb existing contractual rights or duties when there is no express indication that such is the legislature's intent.”
  • \[I]t is generally accepted that the statute in effect at the time an insurance contract is executed governs substantive issues arising in connection with that contract.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.