Hasselman v. Douglass

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “damages” are “the indemnity or pecuniary satisfaction awarded for an injury,” and “include all kinds of damages which might be awarded for an injury”
• “Definitions of this class would clearly include all kinds of damages which might be awarded for an injury, and we think, as used in section 241 of the constitution, the word is used in its broadest sense, and includes all varieties of damages known to the law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).