Haskins v. Kay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Haskins had challenged the validity of the indictment numerous times and “despite his many attempts to refine or restate the claim, he cannot relitigate this issue, which already has been decided against him”
• reversing Superior Court’s dismissal of claim against defendant in his individual capacity, but affirming Superior Court’s dismissal of claim against defendant in his official capacity based on lack of insurance coverage and lack of waiver of sovereign immunity
• reversing Superior Court’s dismissal of claim against defendant in his individual capacity, but affirming Superior Court’s dismissal of claim against defendant in his official capacity based on lack of insurance coverage and lack of waiver of sovereign immunity
• “Even if the Superior Court ultimately concludes that Haskins’ complaint lacks merit, we conclude that dismissal of the complaint at this stage was error because the trial court failed to draw every reasonable inference in favor of Haskins.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).