Haskins v. Haskins
Citations
- 67 Ill. 446
Syllabus
<p>1. Instructions—exception must be to objectionable part where charge is orally upon the whole case. Where parties agree to waive instructions in writing and consent to an oral charge upon the whole case, the party excepting should point out specifically the portion of the charge excepted to. A general exception to the whole charge will not answer.</p> <p>2. Trespass—a forcible eviction can not be justified under a plea of liberum tenementum. Under the decisions in this State, a defense under the plea of liberum tenementum can not be sustained in justification of a forcible eviction of one in the actual, peaceable possession of real estate.</p> <p>3. Forcible detainer—as between vendor and vendee. In order to give a justice of the peace jurisdiction of an action of forcible detainer as between the vendor and vendee of land under the act of 1861, the following elements must be shown by the complaint: 1. The relation of vendor and vendee must exist. 2. The vendee must have obtained possession of the land under the contract. 3. And then it is not sufficient that the vendee has at any time failed to comply with his contract, but he must have failed or refused to comply with it, before obtaining a deed of conveyance. If either of these elements is wanting, the justice acquires no jurisdiction.</p> <p>4. A judgment was rendered for the possession of land in forcible detainer under a complaint, in substance, as follows: That the defendant, on, etc., came into the possession of the following described premises under a contract of purchase from affiant, to-wit: a part of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter in section one, etc., and that the said defendant has failed to comply with his said contract of purchase, and still holds possession wilfully and without force, etc: Held, that the complaint was not sufficient to confer jurisdiction, and also that the description of the land as a part of a tract was void for uncertainty.</p> <p>5. A complaint which fails to s
Judges: McAllister
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pecararo v. HalbergIllinois Supreme Court· 1910-06-29· cited 11×
- Rice v. TravisIllinois Supreme Court· 1905-06-23· cited 10×
- White v. VeitchWyoming Supreme Court· 1921-05-23· cited 6×
- Aurner v. PierceAppellate Court of Illinois· 1903-01-27· cited 3×
- Tietjen v. McCoyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1918-05-07· cited 2×
- Leach v. RitzkeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1899-12-13· cited 2×
- Personal Home Mortgage Co. v. SeegrinAppellate Court of Illinois· 1934-06-15· cited 2×
- Cincinnati, LaFayette & Chicago Railroad v. DucharmeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1879-07-16
- Gerlach v. WalshAppellate Court of Illinois· 1891-06-25
- Rose v. RuyleAppellate Court of Illinois· 1892-04-11
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Reeder v. PurdyIllinois Supreme Court· 1866-04-15· cited 43×
- Snydacker v. BrosseIllinois Supreme Court· 1869-09-15· cited 32×
- Hughes v. StreeterIllinois Supreme Court· 1860-04-15· cited 13×
- Steiner v. PriddyIllinois Supreme Court· 1862-04-15· cited 7×
- Beel v. PierceIllinois Supreme Court· 1849-12-15· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.