Haskins v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dicta summarily stating that “[the mortgagor’s] challenge to the validity of the signatures on the mortgage assignment is precluded by the provisions of G. L. c. 183, § 54B”
• \There is likewise no merit to the plaintiff's claim that MERS is without capacity to execute a valid assignment of the mortgage . . . .\
• “Section 35A contains no definition of the term ‘mortgagee.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).