Haskin v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing fraud claim for failure to satisfy Rule 9(b) where the plaintiff failed to “differentiate between defendants”
• discussing the requirements of Rule 9(b) in conjunction with claims of fraud under Florida law
• “Courts have interpreted Rule 9(b) to require plaintiffs to differentiate their allegations when suing more than one defendant, especially in a case this size, and inform each defendant separately of the allegations surrounding his alleged participation in the fraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).