E.D. California· 5/14/1997
Haskell v. Time, Inc.
Citations
- 965 F. Supp. 1398
- 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6916
- 1997 WL 258893
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “California courts have consistently held that business promotions are not lotteries so 23 long as tickets to enter are not conditioned upon a purchase.”
- “A penal statute is strictly construed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Levi
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2006-01-10· cited 181×
- BROCKET v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-02-20· cited 83×
- Nagel v. Twin Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2003-05-22· cited 77×
- Diaz v. Allstate Insurance GroupC.D. California· 1998-10-14· cited 46×
- O'Connor v. Boeing North American, Inc.C.D. California· 2000-10-10· cited 43×
- Churchill Village, L.L.C. v. General Electric Co.N.D. California· 2000-05-10· cited 38×
- Benson v. Kwikset Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2007-06-29· cited 36×
- Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co.N.D. California· 2005-05-04· cited 34×
- Rice v. Fox Broadcasting Co.Ninth Circuit· 2003-05-29· cited 29×
- Heighley v. J.C. Penney Life InsuranceC.D. California· 2003-04-14· cited 19×
- Wolk v. GreenN.D. California· 2007-09-04· cited 9×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2003-05-29
- Benson v. Kwikset Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2007-07-26
- Opinion No. (2002)California Attorney General Reports· 2002-12-10
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court· 1983-12-22· cited 477×
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court· 1972-05-10· cited 404×
- The Coca-Cola Company v. Tropicana Products, Inc.Second Circuit· 1982-09-29· cited 301×
- Michael FREEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the TIME, INC., Magazine Company, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesNinth Circuit· 1995-10-06· cited 197×
- Johnson & Johnson v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Second Circuit· 1992-04-01· cited 173×
- People v. McKaleCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-11-08· cited 156×
- Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court· 1996-10-31· cited 113×
- Summit Technology, Inc. v. High-Line Medical Instruments, Co.C.D. California· 1996-07-16· cited 56×
- California Gasoline Retailers v. Regal Petroleum Corp. of Fresno, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1958-10-14· cited 54×
- William H. Morris Co. v. Group W, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1995-09-27· cited 48×
- Haskell v. Time, Inc.E.D. California· 1994-06-13· cited 31×
- Century 21 Real Estate Corp. v. Re/Max South CountyC.D. California· 1994-12-20· cited 26×
- People v. K. Sakai Co.California Court of Appeal· 1976-03-25· cited 21×
- People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1944-01-12· cited 17×
- Estate of BrayCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-10-15· cited 11×
- People v. CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-05-28· cited 10×
- Polonsky v. City of South Lake TahoeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-04-03· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.