· 3/30/1995
Haskel, Inc. v. Superior Court
Citations
- 33 Cal. App. 4th 963
- 39 Cal. Rptr. 2d 520
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2367
- 95 Daily Journal DAR 4045
- 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 298
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding a coverage action could proceed to 22 early trial “where there is no potential conflict between the trial of the coverage dispute and the 23 underlying action”
- court should scrutinize the necessity of discovery in declaratory action as to issues material to the underlying proceeding
- “The insurers were either aware of such 4 evidence at the time of the tender [of defense] or they were not; they did not need discovery from 5 [insured] to determine the existence of that evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Croskey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.