Skip to main content
· 3/30/1995

Haskel, Inc. v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 33 Cal. App. 4th 963
  • 39 Cal. Rptr. 2d 520
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2367
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 4045
  • 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a coverage action could proceed to 22 early trial “where there is no potential conflict between the trial of the coverage dispute and the 23 underlying action”
  • court should scrutinize the necessity of discovery in declaratory action as to issues material to the underlying proceeding
  • “The insurers were either aware of such 4 evidence at the time of the tender [of defense] or they were not; they did not need discovery from 5 [insured] to determine the existence of that evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Croskey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.