Skip to main content
· 1/17/1967

Hash v. Henderson

Citations

  • 262 F. Supp. 1016
  • 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8856

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that common questions predominated over individualized issues regarding reliance
  • “Adopting the Carrera approach would have significant negative ramifications for the ability to obtain redress for consumer injuries.”
  • “Since Plaintiff has established that, with.the exception of determining damages, all of the required elements of class certification have been met, the Court will exercise its discretion pursuant to Rule 23(c)(4
  • rejecting notice argument for same reason

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.