Skip to main content
· 10/27/1988

Hasenfus v. Corporate Air Services

Citations

  • 700 F. Supp. 58
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12765
  • 1988 WL 123504

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding no proper abode service where summons left with someone believed to be a resident but who in fact was not
  • finding service was defective when the Return of Service indicated the papers were left with a woman only “believed to reside on the premises”
  • part-time secretary present at home of defendant, but not living there, not proper recipient of service
  • “Bald speculations that defendants are alleged co-conspirators do not constitute the threshold showing necessary to carry the burden of establishing personal jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barrington D. Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.