Hasemeier v. McDonough

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ ‘A wilful or malicious injury is one caused by design. Wilfulness and malice alike import intent.’”
• “[s]uch speculative evidence . . . cannot serve as a basis for opposition to a motion for summary judgment”
• court cautions that Batick does not hold that \a summary judgment may never be rendered in a case involving intent\
• “In ruling on a motion for summary judgment, the court’s function is not to decide issues of material fact, but rather to determine whether any such issues exist.”
• court declines to interpret Batick v. Seymour, 186 Conn. 632 , 443 A.2d 471 (1982) as \holding that a summary judgment may never be rendered in a case involving intent.\
• where the court held that malicious intent can be prove through circumstantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).