Hasemann v. White

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Fund’s liability on a covered claim is subject to statutory limits, such as a maximum amount
• reasoning that limiting Illinois Insurance Guaranty Fund’s setoff to amount actually received under settlement would “invite coUusion and provide little incentive for a claimant to pursue a full and fair settlement with his own carrier”
• outlining the three different approaches that states have adopted when deciding how a claimant “exhausts” his or her rights under another applicable policy
• relying on foreign case law only after confirming that neither Illinois act nor Model Property and Casualty Post-Assessment Guaranty Association Act defined a dispositive statutory term
• relying on foreign case law only after confirming that neither Illinois act nor Model Property and Casualty Post-Assessment Guaranty Association Act defined a dispositive statutory term
• Fund entitled to credit of policy limits although statutory non-duplication clause provides for reduction “by the amount of such recovery”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).