Skip to main content
· 9/29/1987

Harwood v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.

Citations

  • 531 A.2d 823
  • 109 Pa. Commw. 559
  • 1987 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 2496

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the claimant was able and available for work under Section 401(d)(1) where he proved that there were other jobs he could perform and that he had the reasonable possibility to obtain such work, as he was actively applying for other positions
  • stating that under Section 401(d)(1), a claimant must show that he is able to do some type of work and that a reasonable opportunity for securing work exists
  • stating that under Section 401(d)(1), a claimant must show that he is able to do some type of work and that a reasonable opportunity for securing work exists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Craig, Palladino, Barbieri

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.