Harwood v. Auto-Owners Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying reformation to add uninsured owner of the accident vehicle as a “named insured” to a policy owned by uninsured owner’s father because mutual mistake or fraud were not alleged and because uninsured owner was “not a party to the insurance contract”
• “plaintiff does not argue that there was mutual mistake or that defendant committed fraudulent or inequitable conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).