· 4/20/1961
Harwood Pharmacal Co. v. National Broadcasting Co.
Citations
- 9 N.Y.2d 460
- 174 N.E.2d 602
- 214 N.Y.S.2d 725
- 1961 N.Y. LEXIS 1322
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing Drug Research because manufacturer Harwood was directly defamed by language that could readily be understood to charge it with fraud and deceit in putting dangerous product on market
- it could reasonably be inferred that manufacturer of product was defamed although not directly named
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Desmond
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.