Skip to main content
· 9/7/1989

Harvinder Singh Purba Manjit Kaur Purba v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Citations

  • 884 F.2d 516
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 13471
  • 1989 WL 101639

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the statutory lan- guage of section 242(b), combined with the significance of credibility determinations in deportation matters, supports a bright-line rule requiring physical presence before the Immigration Judge
  • holding that the statutory language of section 242(b), combined with significance of credibility determinations in depor- tation matters, supports a bright-line rule requiring physical presence before the Immigration Judge
  • holding that the statutory language of sec- tion 242(b), combined with significance of credibility determinations in deportation matters, supports a bright line rule requiring physical presence before the Immigration Judge
  • holding that an alien is entitled to be physically present at a deportation hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Hug, Tang

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.