Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 12/10/1999
Harville v. State
Citations
- 772 So. 2d 1199
- 1999 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 273
- 1999 WL 1128980
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel was not procedurally barred because \the present Rule 32 petition was Harville's first opportunity to raise the issue of the ineffectiveness of his appellate counsel\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McMillan, Long, Cobb, Baschab, Fry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.