Skip to main content

Harville v. State

Citations

  • 772 So. 2d 1199
  • 1999 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 273
  • 1999 WL 1128980

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel was not procedurally barred because \the present Rule 32 petition was Harville's first opportunity to raise the issue of the ineffectiveness of his appellate counsel\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillan, Long, Cobb, Baschab, Fry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.