Harvey v. State

Citations

• 21 Tex. Ct. App. 178
• 17 S.W. 158
• 1886 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 113

Syllabus

<p>1. Theft—Evidence.—On a trial tor theft of cattle, the State offered in evidence the recorded brand of the alleged owner, to which the accused objected, because the indictment charged the offense to have been committed prior to the record of the brand. Held, that the brand was admissible in support of the allegation of ownership.</p> <p>2. Practice—Continuance.—Hew Trial is properly refused if applied for because of the.refusal of a continuance sought for the purpose of obtaining testimony not probably true.</p>