Supreme Court of Georgia· 6/21/2021
HARVEY v. MERCHAN
Citations
- 860 S.E.2d 561
- 311 Ga. 811
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the theory does not apply where each injury is discrete and known to the victim at the time it occurs
- declining to consider the defendant’s federal and state equal- protection claims separately where neither the defendant nor the trial court below distinguished between those claims
- “For actions based on personal injury, a tort is complete when an injury results from the wrongful act or omission.”
- “[a]bsent adequate notice under OCGA § 9-11-43 (c), [Georgia courts] presume that the foreign law is the same as Georgia’s”
- “Of course, the United States Supreme Court’s construction of a federal constitutional provision does not bind our construction of a similar Georgia constitutional provision, which must be construed independently in the light of the Georgia provision’s text, context, and history.”
- “A plaintiff may not amend the complaint after losing at the summary judgment stage because the plaintiff has a duty to present her case in full in opposing the summary judgment motion or run the risk of an adjudication against her.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- ROCKDALE COUNTY. v. U. S. ENTERPRISES, INC.; And Vice VersaSupreme Court of Georgia· 2021-11-02· cited 17×
- TAYLOR, EXR. v. THE DEVEREUX FOUNDATION, INC. (And Vice Versa)Supreme Court of Georgia· 2023-03-15· cited 16×
- SPANN v. DAVISSupreme Court of Georgia· 2021-11-23· cited 12×
- EFFICIENCY LODGE, INC. v. NEASONSupreme Court of Georgia· 2023-06-21· cited 10×
- Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2022-03-08· cited 7×
- GARDEI v. CONWAYSupreme Court of Georgia· 2022-02-01· cited 7×
- Regan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2023-11-02· cited 4×
- XING CHEN A/K/A TERRY CHEN v. ZHI CHEN A/K/A HELEN CHENCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-11-29
- DAVID BIBLE v. CITY OF ROSWELLCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2025-09-08
- ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. MARK EUBANKSCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2026-03-06
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 2,199×
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court· 1995-04-25· cited 1,142×
- Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court· 1951-10-15· cited 849×
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 800×
- Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia· 1986-05-28· cited 517×
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court· 1885-12-07· cited 499×
- Deal v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-11-18· cited 498×
- Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 356×
- Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2019-02-18· cited 196×
- Summer-Minter & Associates, Inc. v. GiordanoSupreme Court of Georgia· 1973-11-14· cited 194×
- City of Columbus v. AnglinSupreme Court of Georgia· 1904-08-10· cited 143×
- Polito v. HollandSupreme Court of Georgia· 1988-03-09· cited 129×
- Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada v. Imperial Premium Finance, LLCEleventh Circuit· 2018-09-18· cited 129×
- Everhart v. Rich's, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia· 1972-12-04· cited 92×
- Grissom v. GleasonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1992-07-09· cited 90×
- Jankowski v. Taylor, Bishop & LeeSupreme Court of Georgia· 1980-11-25· cited 85×
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2004-11-08· cited 71×
- Morris v. JohnstoneSupreme Court of Georgia· 1931-04-16· cited 54×
- Jones v. Peach Trader Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-10-31· cited 49×
- Curlee v. Mock Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-01-29· cited 44×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.