Harvey v. Mayo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding minute order sufficient because it contained \order\ language, signed by the clerk, contained file stamps, was mailed to the parties, and was entered as an order on the docket
• applying clearly erroneous standard to findings and abuse of discretion standard to decision to award fees
• “The copy of the minute order with its language TT IS ORDERED’ clearly put plaintiff’s counsel on notice that an order had been entered against his client.”
• \The copy of the minute order with its language 'IT IS ORDERED' clearly put plaintiff's counsel on notice that an order had been entered against his client.\
• bad faith found where claim not colorable and plaintiff instituted action for an improper purpose
• the bringing of a case barred by the statute of limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).