Harvey v. Foster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing OCGA § 50-14-4(6), the predecessor to OCGA § 50-14-3(6), which did not require that personnel-related meetings at which evidence is received must be open
• discussing OCGA § 50-14-4 (6), the predeces sor to OCGA § 50-14-3 (6), which did not require that personnel-related meetings at which evidence is received must be open
• “in construing administrative rules, ‘the ultimate criterion is the administrative interpretation, which becomes of controlling weight unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the (rule)’ ”
• “in construing administrative rules, the ultimate criterion is the administrative interpretation, which becomes of controlling weight unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the rule”
• “in construing administrative rules, the ultimate criterion is the administrative interpretation, which becomes of controlling weight 4 unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the rule’”
• “[I]n construing administrative rules, ‘the ultimate criterion is the administrative interpretation, which becomes of controlling weight unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the rule.’ ” (punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).