Harvey v. Folino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the plaintiff agreed to loan money to defendant for a “long period of time,” the statute was no bar. The statute was not invoked despite the fact that the time of the performance was uncertain and could have extended beyond a year.
• “The Statute of Frauds is not applicable here since the transaction was one which could have been performed prior to the expiration of one year, and the fact that the time of performance is uncertain or may extend beyond one year does not aid defendant ....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).