Skip to main content
· 1/26/1981

Harvey v. Eastman Kodak Co.

Citations

  • 610 S.W.2d 582
  • 271 Ark. 783
  • 1981 Ark. LEXIS 1159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that complaint which alleged “negligence” did not state claims for “strict liability or warranty, which are not in any way dependent upon negligence”
  • noting that the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure contain a “significant departure from the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure” in both Rule 8 and Rule 12; the federal rule speaks only in terms of a “claim,” whereas the Arkansas rules specifically require a statement of “facts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.