Skip to main content
· 11/5/1996

Harvey J. Thompson, III v. William McCombe Christine A. Zook Local 192 Amalgamated Transit

Citations

  • 99 F.3d 352
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 13388
  • 153 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2747
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28838
  • 1996 WL 636030

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A 16 party invoking the federal court’s jurisdiction has the burden of proving the actual existence of 17 subject matter jurisdiction.”
  • “A party 27 invoking the federal court’s jurisdiction has the burden of proving the actual existence of subject 28 matter jurisdiction.”
  • “A party invoking the federal court’s 12 jurisdiction has the burden of proving the actual existence of subject matter jurisdiction.”
  • “The party invoking 25 the Court’s jurisdiction bears the burden of proving the actual existence of subject matter 26 jurisdiction.”
  • “A party invoking the federal court’s jurisdiction has the burden of proving the actual 28 1 existence of subject matter jurisdiction.”
  • “A party invoking the federal court’s jurisdiction has the burden of proving the 22 actual existence of subject matter jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Schroeder, Rymer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.