Harvey J. Sanner, Warren D. Jones, Also Known as Corky, H. Dean Adkins v. Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Patrick H. Arbor, Donald G. Andrew

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that farmers who sold crop at allegedly depressed prices suffered harm sufficient for Article III standing
• concluding that there could be no associational standing in a suit that required \the calculation of damages for each of the individual farmers\
• recognizing that cash and futures markets move together
• recognizing that cash and futures markets move together
• reasoning that a linked market may support antitrust standing where it “tends to move in lockstep” with the restrained market and is “ ‘so closely related’ that the distinction between them is of no consequence to antitrust standing analysis”
• rejecting claim that damages analysis in a market manipulation is \beyond the ken of the federal courts\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).