Skip to main content
· 10/20/1995

Federal Case

Citations

  • 68 F.3d 788
  • 26 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20018
  • 41 ERC (BNA) 1577
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29705

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that selecting a favored facility or business with an open and fair bidding process that permits out-of-state competition comports with the dormant Commerce Clause
  • holding that “a statute may be invalid if it favors only a single or finite set of businesses”
  • holding that selecting a favored facility or business with an open and fair bidding process that permits out-of-state competition comports with the dormant Commerce Clause
  • remanding for consideration of effects of local action awarding exclusive waste disposal contract to private local business
  • finding discrimination where the county had a huge economic interest at stake including a $41.5 million guarantee agreement
  • remanding for consideration of effects of local action awarding exclusive waste disposal contract to private local business

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.