· 10/20/1995
Federal Case
Citations
- 68 F.3d 788
- 26 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20018
- 41 ERC (BNA) 1577
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29705
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that selecting a favored facility or business with an open and fair bidding process that permits out-of-state competition comports with the dormant Commerce Clause
- holding that “a statute may be invalid if it favors only a single or finite set of businesses”
- holding that selecting a favored facility or business with an open and fair bidding process that permits out-of-state competition comports with the dormant Commerce Clause
- remanding for consideration of effects of local action awarding exclusive waste disposal contract to private local business
- finding discrimination where the county had a huge economic interest at stake including a $41.5 million guarantee agreement
- remanding for consideration of effects of local action awarding exclusive waste disposal contract to private local business
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.