Skip to main content
· 7/29/1981

Harvestall Industries, Inc. And Vincent B. Steffen v. Levi Hochstetler

Citations

  • 656 F.2d 1232
  • 210 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 878
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 10991

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where design of patent is not particularly sophisticated nor markedly different from the prior art, expert testimony on level of skill is unnecessary
  • summary judgment appropriate in patent cases where there are no material issues of fact and where structure and mode of operation of accused device can be easily comprehended

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Swygert, Judsre, Sprecher, Wyatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.