Hartzog v. Martinez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that there was “a strong argument to be made for the proposition that the right to amend following a final summary judgment should be more restricted than the right to amend prior to summary judgment or where the summary judgment is interlocutory”
• pointing out that the plaintiffs never explained their failure to raise the issue at an earlier time
• proposed pleading amendment untimely where “discovery as to the parties themselves was closed five months earlier”
• proposed pleading amendment untimely where \discovery as to the parties themselves was closed five months earlier\
• prejudice shown where defendants may have been told of inadequate lighting in the stairway, but there was no indication that they would be required to defend against such a claim
• prejudice shown where defendants may have been told of inadequate lighting in the stairway, but there was no indication that they would be required to defend against such a claim.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).