Hartzell Industries, Inc. v. Federal Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Court cannot conceive of damages for the loss of use of tangible property that is not physically injured being anything other than ‘purely economic losses.’ ”
• “the Court cannot conceive of damages for the loss of use of tangible property that is not physically injured being anything other than ‘purely economic losses.’ ”
• for proper application of the impaired property exclusion, insurer required to show that the property “could have regained its full usefulness if [the insured]^ defective fan had been repaired or replaced”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).