Hartz v. Bernot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where defendant charged with statutory forerunner of G. L. c. 266, § 30 [1], trial judge erred in excluding evidence “competent upon the issue of the defendant’s belief’ that money he took was due him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).