· 11/5/1954
Hartung v. Billmeier
Citations
- 243 Minn. 148
- 66 N.W.2d 784
- 1954 Minn. LEXIS 696
- 35 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2154
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that there was no bilateral contract because only plaintiff made a promise
- stating that where an oral contract is susceptible to more than one construction, its construction is for the jury
- holding enforceable employer’s promise of bonus of unspecified amount made after employee started working
- requiring party to perform contractual obligations when other contracting party has fully performed
- employer's promise of a bonus made after the employee started working held enforceable
- indefiniteness should not be invoked to invalidate a writing that reasonably expresses intent of parties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Matson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.