Supreme Court of Minnesota· 11/5/1954
Hartung v. Billmeier
Citations
- 243 Minn. 148
- 66 N.W.2d 784
- 1954 Minn. LEXIS 696
- 35 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2154
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that there was no bilateral contract because only plaintiff made a promise
- stating that where an oral contract is susceptible to more than one construction, its construction is for the jury
- holding enforceable employer’s promise of bonus of unspecified amount made after employee started working
- requiring party to perform contractual obligations when other contracting party has fully performed
- employer's promise of a bonus made after the employee started working held enforceable
- indefiniteness should not be invoked to invalidate a writing that reasonably expresses intent of parties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Matson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-04-29· cited 418×
- Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama· 1987-07-10· cited 182×
- Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-09-21· cited 164×
- Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1962-09-14· cited 133×
- Midway Center Associates v. Midway Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-12-19· cited 104×
- White Lighting Co. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-03-14· cited 79×
- Sylvestre v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-12-14· cited 50×
- Rockney v. BlohornEighth Circuit· 1989-06-06· cited 50×
- United Properties Incorporated, and Hans Bodsgard v. Emporium Department Stores, Inc., Debtor, and Its Creditors CommitteeEighth Circuit· 1967-07-05· cited 46×
- Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1960-08-05· cited 46×
- King v. Dalton Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1961-04-28· cited 38×
- Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. RothchildSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-01-17· cited 36×
- Rochester Civic Theatre, Inc. v. Maria RamsayEighth Circuit· 1966-11-17· cited 34×
- Holt v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1958-06-06· cited 31×
- Tynan v. KSTP, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1956-04-27· cited 30×
- Frank Sullivan Company v. Midwest Sheet Metal WorksEighth Circuit· 1964-07-31· cited 24×
- Wormsbecker v. Donovan Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1956-03-29· cited 22×
- Peters v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-03-08· cited 17×
- TRIPLE B & G, INC. v. City of FairmontCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-12-22· cited 17×
- Bushman v. Pure Plant Food International, Ltd.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-03-02· cited 16×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hammel v. FeighSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1919-06-20· cited 39×
- Scott v. J. F. Duthie & Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1923-07-06· cited 31×
- Twohy v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia· 1952-09-10· cited 29×
- La Du-King Manufacturing Co. v. La DuSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1887-03-04· cited 17×
- Ames-Brooks Co. v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1901-05-31· cited 17×
- Mooney v. Daily News Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1911-12-08· cited 13×
- Gransbury v. SaterbakSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1911-12-29· cited 10×
- Hahnel v. Highland Park CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa· 1915-05-10· cited 4×
- Thompson v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1917-05-04· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.