Skip to main content
· 11/5/1954

Hartung v. Billmeier

Citations

  • 243 Minn. 148
  • 66 N.W.2d 784
  • 1954 Minn. LEXIS 696
  • 35 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2154

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that there was no bilateral contract because only plaintiff made a promise
  • stating that where an oral contract is susceptible to more than one construction, its construction is for the jury
  • holding enforceable employer’s promise of bonus of unspecified amount made after employee started working
  • requiring party to perform contractual obligations when other contracting party has fully performed
  • employer's promise of a bonus made after the employee started working held enforceable
  • indefiniteness should not be invoked to invalidate a writing that reasonably expresses intent of parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.