Hartsfield v. Wray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• outlining requirements for violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-110 et seq.
• Connecticut connection to CUTPA was not at issue where plaintiff purchased electricity from defendants in Connecticut
• “While the text of the contract itself does not indicate that NAPG prices would definitively or precisely be linked with the wholesale market price, with or without the marketing materials, it is plausible that a reasonable consumer would infer a direct link between the two.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).