Skip to main content
· 7/26/1894

Hartsfield v. Chamblin

Citations

  • 42 S.C. 1
  • 19 S.E. 959
  • 1894 S.C. LEXIS 1

Syllabus

<p>1. Parol Evidence — Written Contract.. — Parol testimony of agreements, afterwards reduced to writing and signed by the parties, and under which they acted for years, is inadmissible, where such contract is unambiguous, covers the whole subject-matter, and shows upon its face for what consideration and what purpose it was given.</p> <p>2. Petition for Rehearing granted, some material questions having been possibly overlooked.</p>

Judges: McGowan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.