Skip to main content
· 12/15/2010

Hartry v. County of Suffolk

Citations

  • 755 F. Supp. 2d 422
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132785
  • 2010 WL 5128368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff was required to exhaust his administrative remedies even where he had already been transferred to a different facility, which was the relief he sought
  • rejecting summary judgment where defendant knew 8 plaintiff was cooperating witness, was aware of threats when other inmates discovered this fact and risks facing informants in general

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.