· 12/15/2010
Hartry v. County of Suffolk
Citations
- 755 F. Supp. 2d 422
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132785
- 2010 WL 5128368
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plaintiff was required to exhaust his administrative remedies even where he had already been transferred to a different facility, which was the relief he sought
- rejecting summary judgment where defendant knew 8 plaintiff was cooperating witness, was aware of threats when other inmates discovered this fact and risks facing informants in general
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spatt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.